A couple of days ago I had an interesting conversation about the differences between intent and interest as it applies to targeting ads.
Google is a huge business because they run the biggest “intent engine” in the world. Millions of people are going to Google every day and effectively state their current intent.
If you search for “XBOX Price” Google assumes that you intend to buy an XBOX.
The question is - Is intent all you need in order to target ads for users in the most efficient way?
I argue that the answer is no. Search is a great indicator for intent, but often enough it is not a good indicator for interest.
If you look at Google Trends you can see that a lot more users are searching for the term “Music” than the term “Britney Spears” although Britney is one of the more popular search terms. Same results if we compare the term “Movies” to “Batman” or “The Dark Knight” which was the most popular movie of the year.
We see the same thing in fashion searches as well as gaming.
When people want to buy something, they search for the exact phrase. This is why Google is a great platform for direct marketers who want to “catch” users just before they decide to buy something. But if you want to target users by their long term interests, search is not the best and definitely not the only place you need to put your money.
For example, take people who search for music. They get to iTunes, Rhapsody or any of the other music services and that’s it. Now for the next year, they will get all their music needs there. If you want to target ads for the some of your artists, how do you know which users tend to like each music genre?
Even if you use the user search data you may draw the wrong conclusions. Maybe I searched for Madonna just in order to buy a present to a friend. But if you will know which music I listened to for the past year, you can really conclude what types of music and artist I like and which ones I might like in the future.
This is the still untapped promise of behavioral targeting - the ability to go from intent to interest. It is especially suited for brand advertisers. Unlike direct marketers, brand advertisers want to reach a certain profile of users. The purpose of these campaigns is to build a long term relationship with the user and not a one night stand.
For example, they want to reach the users who are really engage into business and not the ones who looked for stocks right now because it is the main item in the news. They want to reach the real fashion enthusiasts and not the ones who searched for a dress because it’s prom night. They want to know your interests and not just what you want to buy or do today.
Now, to be fair, search could also give you indicators about interest. If every day for a few months I will search for keywords involving financial terms, we can assume that it is part of my interests. But the question is, how many people use search like that? Don’t most people search for something a couple of times, find the sites they need, bookmark them and than start to go there directly?
This is why in the long run, all these social networks, blogging and video sites might have a very bright future. While Google is sitting on today gold mine of intent data, they might be holding to the gold mine of tomorrow - the user interests data.
2 comments ↓
You make a good point, but stop too soon. How do you create interest? If you have an itch, Google is very good at helping you scratch it. But how does a marketer create that itch. What is the most effecient way to get somebody to say “I want that” when the day before they didn’t have any interest or intent.
You right - this is the billion dollar question
I think that creating this “itch” is a combination of a few things:
1. Creative - in the end of the day it is all about the creative. Some ads just “makes” you want to but the product or use the service and some simply don’t.
2. Targeting - even if you have the best creative department in the world, you still need to know which users you want to target with the ad.
Showing an amazing ad for baby food for a single guy is simply a waste of money. Showing me an ad for a great camera just after I purchased one is again a complete waste of money.
But targeting the right ad for the right person based on behavioral data you have on him can give you amazing results.
In many of the behavioral campaign we run for our customers we see X8 more click through rate (even when the ad was under the fold!). And this is not because we built an amazing creative, but because we used great engagement data to understand what to show to each user.
We get clicks on pages that all other ad networks get 0 clicks in, proving that users does click on ads if only you will show them something that they actually has interest for.
3. Time - Sometimes it’s all about timing. If you’ll show me an ad for camera bags just after I purchased a new camera, your chances to win me are much bigger. Taking it to the next level, when we researched some of our data for our customers, we found out that there are specific subjects, specific ads that seems to work much better at certain times of the day than at other times. It also change from country to country.
So I guess my answer is you create this “itch” by getting the right creative to the right person at the right time.
How do you do that?
This is why you need a great data/analytics platform that can help you achieve this.
Leave a Comment