<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life After Page Views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nuconomy.com/2008/02/26/life-after-page-views/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nuconomy.com/2008/02/26/life-after-page-views/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>Analytics, Advertising and everything in between</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hayes</title>
		<link>http://blog.nuconomy.com/2008/02/26/life-after-page-views/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nuconomy.com/2008/02/26/life-after-page-views/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Good stuff.  You might enjoy my posts on attention, the attention economy and the attention rights movement...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff.  You might enjoy my posts on attention, the attention economy and the attention rights movement&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikel Schwarz</title>
		<link>http://blog.nuconomy.com/2008/02/26/life-after-page-views/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikel Schwarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nuconomy.com/2008/02/26/life-after-page-views/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I couldn't agree with you more.  In addition to what you identified, I also suspect that other factors can skew the "time spent on page" results.  For example, people who spend lots of time on social networks or blogs. I'm sure many people go to their favorite sites and leave a browser window open on that page all day (but just go back to that page from time to time). The "engagement time" on that site may only be 15 minutes of actual interaction with the site during an entire day of "time spent" on that page. In addition, I don't know how RSS feed activity/engagement gets measured with todays tools and the effect of personal homepages like igoogle, myyahoo, netvibes, pageflakes, mymsn, etc., but I'm sure that also has an effect on how overall user activity on a site is currently reported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.  In addition to what you identified, I also suspect that other factors can skew the &#8220;time spent on page&#8221; results.  For example, people who spend lots of time on social networks or blogs. I&#8217;m sure many people go to their favorite sites and leave a browser window open on that page all day (but just go back to that page from time to time). The &#8220;engagement time&#8221; on that site may only be 15 minutes of actual interaction with the site during an entire day of &#8220;time spent&#8221; on that page. In addition, I don&#8217;t know how RSS feed activity/engagement gets measured with todays tools and the effect of personal homepages like igoogle, myyahoo, netvibes, pageflakes, mymsn, etc., but I&#8217;m sure that also has an effect on how overall user activity on a site is currently reported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
